GuestLog in

Why exactly did I call it that? There are several reasons. But let's start with the beautiful.

Level Design - depending on the point of view, IF without enemies - is done well and interestingly. The levels are more or less playable. BUT IF you look with enemies - in most cases: dishonest and unplayable. Rather, they are unplayable to the point of pain, because there are a lot of enemies (and some have a lot of HP, or a lot of HP and cause a lot of damage)

Enemies is a separate song. Some have been changed to become dishonest. One touch - lost.

And why can a hack be called beautiful? The graphic part in the hack is just well done, which I would like to thank the author. But it doesn't work because of the number of Enemies on the screen and the level of the Design.

In addition, the hack has non-critical and scary bugs. I refer to the uncritical ones: Inversion of colors, breakdown of graphics from enemies. Scary bugs: SOFTLOCK games after losing to bosses.

If the hack was done more carefully, worked out and more correctly, it could be a gem among "Graphic" and "Level Design". And so - weakly, very weakly.

And therefore: A BEAUTIFUL PAIN. And I definitely don't recommend it!!!

P.S Teleports? Clear. The author himself understood that he did not make a good hack. And implemented teleports almost to the end of the level. They DON'T work correctly either.

A difficult and relatively unpolished hack, but still fun. Pretty much a new experience.

In the original game, powerful monkeys would grab on to the ceiling suddenly and you'd have to deal with a miniboss basically. Now, they can sometimes climb through thin air as if there was a pipe on screen when there isn't. I had this experience in Top Man's stage.

I also found a glitch. I went left at the very beginning of Top Man's stage instead of right and the screen glitched to a different part of the same stage, with the colors inverted. Not sure if repeatable.